Twitter announced that it would be reversing its censorship practices from last week that appeared to be an effort to stop the dissemination of news reports from the New York Post that were damaging to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, according to the Daily Wire.
The act of censorship by Twitter—condemned by lawmakers as an overt attempt in election interference—came in response to news reports from the New York Post that revealed new emails from Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, about his business dealings while Joe Biden was vice president in the Obama administration. Twitter suggested that the information was “hacked,” even though there was no evidence to suggest this was the case. Twitter users repeatedly highlighted the platform’s hypocrisy with its policy enforcement, noting that it allowed The New York Times to run a story about President Donald Trump’s tax returns—which were leaked to the paper—to trend for days.
Vijaya Gadden, Legal, Policy, and Trust & Safety Lead at Twitter, announced that the platform would be making changes in how it handles situations like this in the future. The announcement comes after the platform blocked users from sharing links to the New York Post’s reports and after top Senators on the Judiciary Committee announced that they would be using subpoenas for Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to testify next week about the platform “actively interfering in this election.”
“Over the last 24 hours, we’ve received significant feedback (from critical to supportive) about how we enforced our Hacked Materials Policy yesterday. After reflecting on this feedback, we have decided to make changes to the policy and how we enforce it,” Gadded wrote. “Why the changes? We want to address the concerns that there could be many unintended consequences to journalists, whistleblowers and others in ways that are contrary to Twitter’s purpose of serving the public conversation.”
“We put the Hacked Materials Policy in place back in 2018 to discourage and mitigate harms associated with hacks and unauthorized exposure of private information. We tried to find the right balance between people’s privacy and the right of free expression, but we can do better. We’ve recently added new product capabilities, such as labels to provide people with additional context. We are no longer limited to Tweet removal as an enforcement action,” Gadde continued. “We believe that labeling Tweets and empowering people to assess content for themselves better serves the public interest and public conversation. The Hacked Material Policy is being updated to reflect these new enforcement capabilities.”
Gadde highlighted two changes that are being made:
1. We will no longer remove hacked content unless it is directly shared by hackers or those acting in concert with them.
2. We will label Tweets to provide context instead of blocking links from being shared on Twitter.
“All the other Twitter Rules will still apply to the posting of or linking to hacked materials, such as our rules against posting private information, synthetic and manipulated media, and non-consensual nudity,” Gadde concluded. “I’m grateful for everyone who has provided feedback and insights over the past day. Content moderation is incredibly difficult, especially in the critical context of an election. We are trying to act responsibly & quickly to prevent harms, but we’re still learning along the way. We will continue to keep you all updated on our progress and more details as we update our policy pages to reflect these changes in the coming days.”
Dorsey later commented Gadde’s tweets, writing: “Straight blocking of URLs was wrong, and we updated our policy and enforcement to fix. Our goal is to attempt to add context, and now we have capabilities to do that.”